Aged-out youth are often between the ages of 16 and 19 who exit institutions such as prisons, child welfare systems, and other institutions into community life. They are a large demographic with unique characteristics, strengths, inner power and resilience.  Support for addressing the needs of aged-out youth should draw upon their strengths, personal interests, identity, and knowledge. Their lived experience makes them unique experts, as they oftentimes know what is best for them, thus requiring tailored approaches that align with their goals and needs.

Unfortunately, this demographic is often mischaracterized within institutions, often labelled as “trouble”, and “at-risk”. Their lived experience interacting with systems, alongside their marginalized social locations, heightens their vulnerabilities to individual and structural risk factors.  Aged out youth are more than harmful stereotypes; these are individuals with a multitude of complexities, capabilities and assets to contribute to society. Support that values autonomy, dignity, and equity is needed, alongside support that highlights structural causes of their precarity rather than seeking to shift individual blame or victimization.
In 2025, Campaign 2000 collaborated on various national housing-focused initiatives, including the release of the Neha Review Panel’s final report {1}. The Neha Review Panel is a crucial, groundbreaking human rights enforcement mechanism created to address systemic housing insecurity. This vital mechanism is one of the few human rights-centred review panels in Canada that draws on the housing needs and lived experiences of women, Two Spirit, Trans, gender-diverse people, and young people experiencing poverty. Discussion centred on aged-out young people who are vulnerable to housing insecurity, incarceration, and acute poverty. A year after the panel, concerns about aged-out youth transitioning to adulthood remain, as these vulnerable demographic needs are grossly unmet. Policy reform must be implemented and operated through a human rights, intersectional, and anti-oppressive approach.

Neoliberal policies, such as cutting government spending on vital social programs, are felt acutely by youths who need support. Poverty-reduction initiatives, ranging from income support to transitional housing and employment services, can help youth successfully exit institutions. Campaign 2000 report card highlights a “2025 report card by the Standing Senate Committee on Youth Aging Out of Care based on the 8 Transition to Adulthood Pillars of the Equitable Standards“{1}.

Racialized youth are disproportionately interacting with institutions such as child welfare and judicial systems, thus requiring anti-discriminatory measures to be enacted to eliminate race-based oppression. Black and Indigenous youth experience discrimination throughout their engagement with institutions, as they are more likely to be separated from their families by child welfare agencies and more likely to receive punitive outcomes than their white counterparts. Anti-Black and anti-Indigenous racism continues after transitioning out of care, as racism is deeply embedded in employment and housing systems, increasing the risk of poverty.
Programs, policies, and practitioners must defer from practices that do not consider race and intersectionality and engage in trauma-informed and culturally safe approaches that recognize and seek to dismantle racial disparities at all levels. Youth need a voice in their care, as their lived experience can help inform stronger interventions and enable self-determination and autonomy. Aged-out Youth are more than their labels; while it is significant to note their marginalization, it is also important to recognize their strength and resilience. There is a significant portion of aged-out young people who successfully transitioned out of care and contribute to society; for some, their capabilities are hindered by structural obstacles. Structural reform must be put in place to eliminate barriers and foster a safe, supportive and inclusive transition for all youth.

References

{1} https://cms.nhc-cnl.ca/media/Neha/Reports/final-report-and-recommendations-ENGLISH%20(web).pdf

{2} https://campaign2000.ca/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/2025-Report-Card-on-Child-and-Family-Poverty.pdf

{3} https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tUovRRFHieI

{4} https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xFedfeuC_aA

{5} Cover Photo retrieved from C2K National Report Card.

Read More At:

• Campaign2000 report card, Investing in Tomorrow: Future without Poverty (2025), calls upon the Canadian government to uphold the promise to eliminate child poverty by the year 2000, read more about the progress here: https://campaign2000.ca/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/2025-Report-Card-on-Child-and-Family-Poverty.pdf
• Watch: Dialogue on Adequate Housing for Families and Preventing Child Apprehension (YouTube).
• Read: Neha Review Panel Final Report.
• Visit: Neha Review Panel releases reports, advocates call for action.

National Indigenous Peoples Day (June 21, 2026), is a holiday that honours the diverse and rich cultures, histories, and resilience of Indigenous Peoples. Indigenous Peoples have inhabited these lands for thousands of years, communicating through complex and beautiful languages. Indigenous Peoples have maintained unique knowledge systems, traditions, and ways of life.

Drawing on this day’s core values, it is significant to address the barriers faced by the Indigenous population, particularly children and youth, to participating in their cultural practices.

Investing in Tomorrow: Future Without Poverty (2025) illustrates the high poverty rates of Indigenous children compared to their non-Indigenous counterparts, linking these disproportionate rates to historic and ongoing effects of colonization, institutional racism, marginalization, and discrimination. The report found that 23.7% of Indigenous children lived in poverty, a rate that is two times higher than that of non-Indigenous children{1}. The socioeconomic status of Indigenous children and families has played a key role in cultural erosion. Poverty and inequality can contribute to the lack of means to engage in cultural practices due to material deprivation. Indigenous families residing on reserves experience food and housing insecurity at alarming rates. In 2024, nearly one in three Indigenous Peoples aged 15 and older were living in moderate or severely food-insecure households {2}. As a result, Indigenous families may spend more time focusing on their economic challenges rather than engaging in cultural practices.

Furthermore, state interventions such as child welfare can result in Indigenous children losing access to their cultures and traditions. Child welfare systems seek to protect the well-being of children, and those that fall into the categories of being at risk of “imminent or future danger” face high chances of being apprehended into state care {3}. However, there are significant racial disparities for children who are removed from their homes. Indigenous children and youth are apprehended at disproportionate levels, making up 30% of those in state custody despite representing a smaller proportion of the population {3}. One rationale behind these removals can be attributed to “neglect”; a parent who is unable to provide necessities (i.e., housing and food) sufficiently may face the removal of their child into state care. Indigenous populations, especially those living on reserves, often lack proper infrastructure, social safety nets, and resources such as clean water and safe housing. These issues are further amplified by colonial practices and policies that have resulted in intergenerational trauma and unhealthy coping mechanisms, making Indigenous populations more vulnerable to poverty.

 The mass removal of children mirrors the legacy of residential schools, where children and youth were forcibly taken from their homes, communities, families, and cultures. Residential schools operated for over a century, with closures occurring as recently as the 1990s. These institutions operated nationwide with the intent of assimilating students into Euro-Canadian society. Although residential schools have closed, anti-Indigenous racism continues to operate within contemporary institutions. Indigenous children are being separated from their families, community members, and Elders, losing access to communal support, a fundamental aspect of Indigenous ways of life. Additionally, reduced interaction with cultural and spiritual teachings, combined with placement in care with non-Indigenous or Western caregivers, reinforces the same patterns of cultural genocide inflicted during the residential school era.

Despite historic, organized efforts to suppress Indigenous Peoples and dismantle their ways of life, these measures have failed. Indigenous communities remain deeply committed to disrupting settler colonialism, an ongoing act of resurgence and collective strength. Thriving through resistance, celebrations such as National Indigenous Peoples Day represent a powerful defiance against cultural suppression and systemic oppression. June 21, 2026, marks the 30th anniversary of National Indigenous Peoples Day. Coinciding with the summer solstice, the longest day of the year, this date holds significant spiritual and cultural significance, as many Indigenous nations have gathered here for generations to practice their traditions and celebrate new beginnings. Centred on the key themes of restoration and celebration, National Indigenous Peoples Day provides an opportunity for Indigenous Peoples to fully embrace and practice their heritage while promoting dialogue, relational learning, and meaningful community engagement with allies. Ultimately, seeking true reconciliation requires the federal government to establish concrete, meaningful efforts that support cultural revitalization, address structural inequalities, and fully uphold the self-governance and self-determination of Indigenous Peoples.

The Campaign200 report card, Investing in Tomorrow: A Future without Poverty (2025), calls upon the Canadian government to uphold its promise to eliminate child poverty by the year 2000. Read more about the progress here: https://campaign2000.ca/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/2025-Report-Card-on-Child-and-Family-Poverty.pdf.

Post By: Mariam Mumin (2026-06-19)

References

{1} https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/t1/tbl1/en/tv.action?pid=9810028301

{2} https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/t1/tbl1/en/tv.action?pid=1310083501

{3} www.ohrc.on.ca/en/interrupted-childhoods-over-representation-indigenous-and-black-children-ontario-child-welfare

Blog post by Shannon Udall, MSW Student

Ending child poverty in Canada requires equity for, and the inclusion of, all communities. As Black History Month comes to a close, we must recognize that  Black history in Canada is shaped by discriminatory policies, bias in institutions and anti-Black racism. This history continues into present Canadian culture and public policies. Across Canada, anti-Black racism continues to result in higher rates of poverty experienced by Black children and families.

2016 Census data show that 30.2% of Black children under 18 in Canada live in poverty in comparison with 17% of children under 18 in Canada, overall[1]. This rate rises in Ontario, where 32.8% of Black children live in poverty compared to 18.4% of children under 18 .[2]

We  know that Black children and youth experience drastically higher rates of discipline in the school system[3]. They also represent 37% of apprehended children in care of the Children’s Aid Society of Toronto, despite only accounting for 8% of the population[4]. Black Canadians are also incarcerated at a disproportionate rate[5] and face discrimination in accessing housing, employment and social services.[6] These systemic factors result in Black Canadians experiencing higher rates of poverty.

Black history month reminds us to remember and acknowledge the passionate work and advocacy of Black communities to organize around these issues and to resist anti-Black racism. It is also a time to amplify the stories of resistance and resilience that have shaped Black Canadian history. Canadians of African descent have been on this land as long as British and French colonists[7]. Despite Canada’s reputation as a refuge for African Americans since the time of the Underground Railroad, Black Canadians have and continue to experience many of the same injustices experienced by Black Americans including slavery, institutional segregation, extreme public violence and housing discrimination[8]. While there has been recent progress from Government, including the Government of Canada’s recognition of the International Decade for People of African Decent and the creation of anti-black racism strategies in the province of Ontario and the city of Toronto, Black communities in Canada still experience high rates of discrimination and injustice.

An important step in moving forward to address these inequalities is the need to collect disaggregated data. The lack of disaggregated data concerning race obscures the extent of anti-Black racism in Canada. All levels of government must commit to collecting disaggregated race- based data to analyze how policies and programs support and fail racialized communities and direct resources to filling the gaps that so many families fall through. The Government must restore, enhance and strengthen Canada’s Action Plan Against Racism (CAPAR) based on community input and respond to growing concerns about racial profiling plaguing Black, Indigenous and racialized families[1].  As Canadians we must recognize ongoing and historical injustices and hold our government and ourselves accountable for ending the policies and beliefs that perpetuate anti-Black racism in Canada. Black communities have survived and thrived in their resistance to anti-Black racism. It’s now Canada’s turn to commit to equity and racial justice.

[1] A Poverty Free Canada Requires Federal Leadership
[2] Data tables, 2016 Census
[3] Canadian Education is Steeped in Anti-Black Racism
[4] Drop in number of Black children placed in care heralded as good start
[5] Statement to the media by the United Nations’ Working Group of Experts on People of African Descent, on the conclusion of its official visit to Canada, 17-21 October 2016
[6] City of Toronto-funded ads confront anti-black racism
[7] Anti-Black Racism in Canada – A Historical Perspective
[8] Canadian Education is Steeped in Anti-Black Racism

Post by MSW Student, Mallory Hilkewich

I read the article by Carol Goar quoting depressing sentiments about young people from MPP Julia Munro. While I feel a sense of optimism that issues of poverty and inequity affecting children and youth are being discussed, I fear the state of political will. As a young person I urge politicians to stop the rhetoric of youth incompetence and apathy, and start voicing belief and encouragement.

Campaign 2000 just came out with a national report card on Child & Family Poverty titled Let’s Do This: Let’s End Child Poverty for Good. A call to action is heralded in response to the new governments – platform promise to create a national anti-poverty plan. Yet the plan must be accompanied by thoughtful, targeted action.

As the report states, government must legislate change with a national Early Childhood Education and Care program, a comprehensive housing strategy and ensure the new Canada Child Benefit design reduces the child poverty rate by 50% in 5 years.

Government should take seriously the fact that nationwide nearly 1 in 5 children live in poverty. Toronto itself has eight ridings with child poverty rates over 30%. And disturbingly, entrenched poverty on First Nation reserves and systemic discrimination have created higher proportions of Indigenous youth in the care of child welfare and who are incarcerated.

It is disheartening when politicians spout one-sided stories as their proof that a generation of youth is incompetent. Easily, an alternative narrative can be shared.

Youth took action with their right to vote this election. Over 70,000 voted early on campuses and some estimates predict a 10% increase in turnout from 2011. You can find youth across Ontario and Canada working to take action and create opportunities where little exists. Take for example the nearly 700 youth that created the Y2K Strategy in Kingston to improve community environment, health, and wellness. Youth are often working hard and taking action, but their actions easily go unrecognized.

Rather than sharing criticizing stories, politicians should focus energy to combat a youth unemployment rate that is almost double the national average. Politicians should address the student debt Ontario students face from paying the highest average tuition in Canada. Politicians should know that Ontario students would have to work a full summer at minimum wage just to afford tuition (let alone food, rent, books). Politicians should create opportunities for homeless youth, a large portion who fled experiences of interpersonal violence, emotional, physical and/or sexual abuse.

Politicians should use this evidence to recognize the conditions that prevent youth from reaching their potential. That our own Prime Minister is the Minister of Youth and the Liberal platform committed to creating a Commissioner for Children and Young Persons gives a nod to the unique and pressing needs of children and young people. Let’s change the conditions of poverty. Let’s embrace encouragement rather than disbelief.